EcoIvy.org

...because we care for Ivybridge

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Articles

Acid Rain, Dartmoor and Christmas Trees

E-mail Print PDF

This week I got chatting to a few people about the effects that acid rain falling on Dartmoor will likely have from the proposed incinerator.

The effects of acid rain on this area hasn't as yet really been discussed, but any scientist will tell you that the incinerator would result in acid rain and the emission maps show us very clearly where the fallout from such would likely land, on this side of Dartmoor just North of Ivybridge.

The fact that we now also have the new power station at Plympton and will soon have a massive mining operation taking place a the Hemerdon Mine just North of Sparkwell means that the accumulative effect of all these new industries is going to have a significant effect on our air quality, and acid rain. There is also the theory that the build up of C02 emissions from all of these facilities will risk an insulating layer of air that could likely effect in polluted smog being formed over Dartmoor, which would make the matter even worse.

This is of particular concern to a fellow campaigner who is also a large grower and supplier of Christmas trees based in Harford, which is right in the middle of where the emissions are predicted to fall. There are about 100,000 Christmas trees growing there, a major supplier of trees to the South West. The business constitutes the livelihoods of at least 3 families and is also a local source of employment for this area.

We thought to Google the topic of acid rain on fir trees. Got some great evidence in our campaign against incineration, but unfortunately the future is not looking bright for our local industry of Christmas trees, or for the future vegetation and wildlife of Dartmoor I am afraid.

Here's just a few articles I stumbled across, I am sure you can find plenty more:

http://www.libraryindex.com/pages/1139/Acid-Rain-EFFECTS-ACID-RAIN-ON-OUR-ENVIRONMENT.html
http://www.elmhurst.edu/~chm/vchembook/196forests.html
http://www.epa.gov/acidrain/effects/
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic-art/603935/39754/Spruce-trees-damaged-by-acid-rain-in-Karkonosze-National-Park
http://www.eoearth.org/article/Acid_rain
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20020719030207data_trunc_sys.shtml

I am hopeful that the Environmental Audit Committee's recent Air Quality report will encourage our local planning office to take these concerns extremely seriously.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 12:52
 

Map of the Proposed Site

The red pointer shows the proposed location of the incinerator. The landfill would go into the disused quarry below the pointer (the pool of water shown on the map, which appears to be about 150 feet from the river).

Note that you can zoom in and out of the map using the controls on the left.

 

JavaScript must be enabled in order for you to use Google Maps.
However, it seems JavaScript is either disabled or not supported by your browser.
To view Google Maps, enable JavaScript by changing your browser options, and then try again.

 

Distance of proposed incinerator from local towns and villages.

E-mail Print PDF

Here's a table of distances in miles, as the crow flies, of surrounding towns and villages from the proposed Viridor incinerator.

0.5    Lee Mill
0.5    Smithaleigh
1.6    Endsleigh Garden Centre
1.9    Dunstone
2       Ivybridge
2       Sparkwell
2       Yealmpton
2.2    Plympton
2.6    Ford
2.7    Flete
2.7    Lutton
2.8    Ermington
2.9    Brixton
2.9    Drakelands
2.9    Holbeton
3      Cornwood
3.2    Strode
3.5    Collaton Cross
3.5    Elburton
3.6    Colebrook
3.8    Harford
3.9    Battisborough Cross
4.2    Modbury
4.5    Lee Moor
4.6    Bittaford
4.6    Moorhaven
4.9    Kingston
4.9    Newton Ferrers
4.9    Plymstock
5       Marsh Mills
5       Ugborough
5.1    Wotter
5.3    Staddiscombe
5.4    Noss Mayo
5.4    Wembury
5.6    Estover
5.7    Wrangaton
6.1    Eggbuckland
6.1    Shaugh Prior
6.2    Hooe
6.4    Bickleigh
6.4    Ringmore
6.7    Bigbury
6.7    Derriford
6.8    Chalaborough
6.8    Heybrook Bay
6.8    Woolwell
7       South Brent
7.1    Didworthy
7.1    Plymouth (Centre)
7.3    Avonwick
7.5    Aveton GIfford
8.3    Diptford
8.5    Loddiswell
8.7    Thurlestone
9       Churchstow
9.7     South Milton
10      Rattery
10.4    Hope
10.5    Galmpton
10.5    Kingsbridge
11       Buckfastleigh
11.4    East Allington
11.5    Malborough
11.7    Habetonford
12      Totnes
12.1    Coombe
12.2    Chorleton
12.7    Dartington
13      Salcombe
13.2    Blackawton
13.4    Frogmore
13.8    East Portlemouth
14.2    Challington
14.8    Stokenham
15.2    Slapton

This incinerator should be of concern to South Devon residents near and far.

Incinerators release very small nanoparticles which may be the most dangerous particles in the emissions since they are so small they cannot be filtered out, and also because of their tiny size they penetrate through skin and into internal organs. They also remain suspended in air for a long time and are known to travel long distances. With the chimney stack so high it may well be that it is not the Lee Mill and Ivybridge residents that have as much to worry about regarding health risks as those towns and villages further afield.

In addition this incinerator will put a drain on council taxes and burn our future resources, putting a cap on recycling for years to come for the whole of South Devon. Dioxins and other toxins will build up in the food chain affecting our farming industry and ash leaching in to the river will effect our fishing industries and local marine life.

Please email the link to this table to everyone you know in South Devon and urge them to write letters of objection to the Devon County Council planning authority, the South West Devon Waste Partnership and also your local councillors. Incineration is not necessary, there are alternatives, and initial research on the NEQ Taskforce has indicated that recycling rates of up to 90% for South Hams could be achieved with the right investment.

Last Updated on Monday, 15 February 2010 20:03
 

Are Incinerators Bad for your Health?

E-mail Print PDF

I had an open mind about the health risks of incinerators. My initial thought was that incinerators were terribly bad dirty things and I certainly didn't want one on my doorstep. Then I spoke to my brother who works in the environment sector and has technical knowledge on this subject. He said that they weren't as bad as I thought; the newer ones are much cleaner than they used to be, and there are very tight restrictions placed on emissions.

My brother said that in his mind bigger concerns were not what comes out of the chimney but what is done with the ash (both fly ash and bottom ash) which can have high levels of metals and is often hazardous, as well as lorry movements and the possible build up of traffic congestion which would lead to an increase in air pollution and C02 emissions. His thought was that the pollution from any increase in traffic in the area would likely be far more significant than the air pollution from the chimney.

So I thought to do some research on the matter and did read the fairly recent statement from the Heath Protection Agency (http://www.hpa.org.uk/web/HPAwebFile/HPAweb_C/1251473372218) which states that the HPA believe that any potential damage to the health of those living close by to a 'modern well regulated municipal waste incinerator' is likely to be very small, if detectable. Their conclusion is based on assessments of air pollutants on health and the fact that 'modern well managed municipal waste incinerators' make only a very small contribution to local concentrations of air pollutants.

The HPA document states that the incineration process can result in 3 potential sources of exposure: from emissions in the air, via the ash residues and via the cooling water. Provided that the ash and cooling water is appropriately handled and disposed of, they conclude that the only route of exposure to people is through the air emissions, therefore their document focuses entirely on the air emissions and does not discuss the disposal of ash residues and the cooling water.

The HPA does not say that incinerators do no pollute the air. It is widely accepted that all incinerators, even well managed modern incinerators, do pollute, but the HPA considers that the total amount of pollution that comes from these (the modern incinerators) compared to other air pollutants is very small in comparison.

In other words, we could conclude that we are all effected by air pollution (most of which comes from traffic) - throwing in some emissions from modern well run incinerators into the mix won't make any significant difference.

The HPA said that they cannot give the assurance that that there would be zero effect on public health, but that additional burdens on public health of local populations due to modern incinerators is likely to be very small. They say that previous studies done linking adverse effects to incinerators were on older less efficient incinerators that emitted higher levels of pollutants. The problem here is that studies on the impact of newer incinerators have yet to be completed, because these incinerators are, well, new....The conclusion being that we will only know with certainty the effects of modern incinerators in the future.

The HPA statement and the discussion with my environmentally minded brother alleviated my initial concerns. However, I wasn't entirely satisfied with the evidence presented and therefore dug a little deeper to see what else I could find.

Not being a chemist, it is hard to understand a lot of the reports completed following scientific studies, but what quickly became apparent is that there is a huge amount of concern about the move towards incineration in the UK across the country, with huge incinerators springing up all over the place (not surprising since there are many lucrative deals to be had in this area at the moment). At the same time however, many other countries are taking large steps to try and move away from incineration.

I am posting the sites and interesting documents that I come across to the Resources section of ecoivy.org. If you come across any resources that you would also like to add then please register on the site from where you will be able to submit links directly. Both links to resources in favour of and against incineration are welcome. The ecoivy.org is not (yet) for or against incineration - at the moment it is simply researching the facts and trying to get all Ivybridge residents involved in the discussion and aware of the issues.

In particular, regarding the effect of incinerators on health, I found the following document to be comprehensive and well researched. It has been put together by a coalition of six environmental organizations in Canada,  including the Pembina Institute, the David Suzuki Foundation, Sierra Legal, Toronto Environmental Alliance, Canadian Environmental Law Association and Great Lakes United. It is well worth a read:

http://pubs.pembina.org/reports/Incineration_FS_Pollution.pdf

What I found particularly troubling when reading this document was that fact that dioxins and similar chemicals, which are emitted by even the most state of the art incinerators, are persistent and bioaccumlative. Pollutants released in stack gasses travel through the air where they are not only inhaled but also deposited on soils, surface waters and vegetation. They get into the food chain, where they  ‘bioaccumulate and biomagnify so that food, especially fish and animal products, become the primary route of human exposure’. That being said, the new incinerators might not give out as many emissions, but the newly proposed incinerators are super-sized, and growing rapidly in number, so isn't it just a matter of time before the accumulation of dioxins produced by these incinerators build up in the environment to create a significant impact on health? And when that has happened, and the pollution is distributed throughout the food chain, will we be able to do anything to reverse the damage? Living in Devon, an area where farming and agriculture play an important role in the local economy, I cannot understaned why the local government would be prepared to take any risk of environmental contamination that may work its way into our local farming produce. The other important economical activity for our region is of course tourism. People come out to Devon for the countryside and clean air, to escape for a time from the big cities. Devon people should strive to do everything they can to protect this environment and to ensure it is not spoilt in a way that could potentially result in irreversible damage. The current governmental plan is to build super-incinerators across the South West: one for Cornwall, one for South Devon, one for North Devon, and one for Exeter.

There are also documents addressing the issues of global warming and financial implications of incineration to be found on the Pembina website that should also be read:
http://www.pembina.org/pub/1449

I also found a well written document that specifically discusses the links of incineration to cancer, which was published by the Canadian 'Prevent Cancer' organisation:
http://preventcancernow.ca/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/pcn-incin21.pdf

I am now starting to lean towards the conclusion that the UK's move towards incineration is setting a ticking time bomb of serious health problems and a rise in CO2 that will be left to our children to cope with in the future, that shows a lack of consideration towards the rest of the plant. The effects of the such air pollution and the release of dioxins into the UK environment have implications not just for UK citizens but forthe  world.

"The latest scheme masquerading as a rational and responsible alternative to landfills is a nationwide – and worldwide – move to drastically increase the use of incineration… The principal consequence of incineration is thus the transporting of the community’s garbage – in gaseous form, through the air – to neighbouring communities, across state lines, and indeed, to the atmosphere of the entire globe, where it will linger for many years to come. In effect, we have discovered yet another group of powerless people upon whom we can dump the consequences of our own waste; those who live in the future and cannot hold us accountable."
Al Gore

Please, everyone  in support of incineration, come and argue with me in the ecoivy.org forum - I don't want to draw to any hasty conclusions without considering all the facts and hope (for my children's sake) that I am mistaken in my recent findings.

Last Updated on Saturday, 21 November 2009 20:13
 

Need for incinerator in West Devon?

E-mail Print PDF

I am convinced that figures used to predict the need for a large incinerator in West Devon are wrong because they do not give sufficient consideration to:-

1. Manufacturers suddenly wanting to reduce amount of packaging on goods;

2. Households at last getting message about reuse and recycle (I expect huge increase in enthusiasm for recycling in Ivybridge now);

3. Increased facilities and incentives for recycling of trade waste;

4. Increase in value of resources such as glass and plastics.

 

Devon has the budget for improving recycling OR building incinerators, not both. Which would you prefer?. Once built,  incinerators need a constant supply of waste and that discourages recycling. They also need a proportion of paper and plastic to facilitate the burn.

Modern incinerators are 'safest' at maximum temperature. It is during heating and cooling that they are more likely to emit toxins.

Our councillors do not seem to have heard about other modern and safer technologies such as gas plasmification and MBT. Well neither had I a few weeks ago! I learnt from my own research that the front runner seems to be MBT (Mechanical Biological Treatment). This screens and processes biodegradable waste and dries the residue which is then inert ie cannot break down to produce toxic gases and liquids. It is possible with this method to process small quantities of waste and it does not have to be continuous process. Of course this is more expensive than straightforward burning, but what price can be put on our health?

 

Last Updated on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 13:52
 

Waste Localisation and Eco Moral

E-mail Print PDF

Did you know..?

"Devon is one of the largest counties in England, with wide spread communities, so dealing with waste closest to its source is important both for economic and environmental reasons."

That's what it says on the South West Devon Waste Partnership website.

I couldn't agree more that 'dealing with waste closest to its source is important both for economic an environmental reasons'.

Why then has the partnership decided that one super-sized incinerator for the whole of Devon is the way to go?

Why should we be shipping waste out of Plymouth and out of Torbay (the poorest recyclers) out to South Hams (the best recyclers) clogging up our roads, causing likely congestion on the A38, increasing CO2 emissions unnecessarily? Why not deal with waste where it is made, and that way, if local people don't want an incinerator they can step up their recycling efforts and if they want to they might look at greener alternatives for their locality, or else face the consequences of chucking everything in the bin without thought.

To plant an incinerator in South Hams is an insult to all those people in the area that care about our environment and go out of their way to recycle. Locking us into a contract that would require us to keep on generating a set level of waste for the next 25 years to feed the fire would undermine all recycling efforts in the area and do a lot of harm to our eco moral.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 11:50
 


Email Updates

Add your email here to receive email updates about this issue. Your email won't be used for any other purpose and won't be passed on to anyone else.
Name:
Email:

Login

Please log in here to post items to the forum and submit links or articles to be included on this site. Please get involved, we need your input!

Polls

Are you satisfied that the public has been fully consulted regarding the plans to build an incinerator at the New England Quarry?
 
Do you think an incinerator is a good solution for Devon's waste?
 
Are you mostly in support of Viridor's plans to build an incinerator at this location?
 

Newsflash

Please sign the following petition:

http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/c02incineration/


Please also post the link to any UK forum or pressure group that is concerned about C02 emissions or incineration. Thanks!